Orbital Fracture AI Platform (DenseNet169-UNet)
Automated detection, side localization, and segmentation of orbital blowout fractures on CT images
▸ More attributes
Brief overview
This study uses DenseNet-169 and U-Net architectures to classify orbital blowout fractures and segment fracture regions from orbital CT images, leveraging 3,016 retrospectively collected scans from a single Chinese tertiary center. The framework distinguishes fracture vs non-fracture cases, lateralization (left vs right eye), and performs pixel-wise fracture segmentation with reported performance of AUC ~0.99 for classification and Dice coefficient ~0.89 for segmentation, alongside IoU ~0.82. Training used ImageNet-pretrained weights with internal 8:1:1 splitting and 5-fold cross-validation, with strong performance consistency across held-out test folds. Preprocessing included OpenCV-based ROI extraction and data augmentation via random rotations, with all annotations generated by consensus of expert radiologists using LabelMe. No code repository, pretrained weights, or deployment interface are reported, and the model remains entirely internally validated without external cohort testing or clinical implementation.
AUC 0.99; accuracy 0.97 (classification); Dice 0.88 (segmentation).
AUC 0.99; accuracy 0.97 (classification); Dice 0.88 (segmentation).
| Study design | Diagnostic accuracy study |
|---|---|
| Center type | Single-center |
| Patients | 497 |
| Images / eyes | 3016 CT images |
| Split | 80/10/10 + 5-fold cross-validation |
| Reporting frameworks | None stated |
| Age range | 37-40 |
|---|---|
| Sex (% female) | Not reported |
| Race / ethnicity reported | N |
| Subgroup performance | N |
- Concept
- Prototype
- Internal val.
- External val.
- Regulator
- Clinical
▸ Why this score?
The APPRAISE-AI tool grades AI/ML medical studies across 24 items in 6 subdomains, scored independently by two reviewers. The total reflects the methodological transparency of the publication — not the underlying clinical value of the model.
How to read this: high scores in clinical relevance and reporting with low scores in methodological conduct, robustness, or reproducibility is the dominant pattern in ophthalmic AI today.
Quality bands: Low <40 · Moderate 40–59 · High 60–79 · Very High 80+. Most published ophthalmic AI sits in the Low–Moderate band; studies that break into High typically combine multi-center datasets, prospective evaluation, and open-source release.
Bibliographic record ▸
| Model ID | oculoplastics_bao_2023 |
|---|---|
| Full author list | Zhan, X., Wang, L., Zhu, Q., Fan, B., & Li, G. Y. |
| Journal | Transl Vis Sci Technol |
| DOI | 10.1167/tvst.12.4.7 |
| Conditions | Orbital blow out fracture |
Model internals ▸
| Architecture family | CNN |
|---|---|
| Architecture detail | Convolutional neural-network models (DenseNet-169 and UNet) |
Disclosures ▸
| Funding | National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82171053 and 81570864); Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (No. 20200801043GH and 20190201083JC) |
|---|---|
| Conflicts of interest | NR |
Status, version, reviewers ▸
| Card status | Published |
|---|---|
| Card version | v1.0.0 |
| First added | 2026-04-28 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-28 |
| Reviewers | attribution opt-in pending |
Card changelog ▸
- 2026-04-28 initial publication (v1.0.0)