EyeModelHub
Home Subspecialties Oculoplastics Model card
§Model Card

Orbital Fracture AI Platform (DenseNet169-UNet)

Automated detection, side localization, and segmentation of orbital blowout fractures on CT images

Bao X.L. · 2023 · China · doi:10.1167/tvst.12.4.7
Open DOI
Segmentation CNN CT Internally validated
More attributes
Anatomy · OrbitConditions · Orbital blow out fractureSingle-centern = 497 patients · 3016 CT images images
§01Overview

Brief overview

This study uses DenseNet-169 and U-Net architectures to classify orbital blowout fractures and segment fracture regions from orbital CT images, leveraging 3,016 retrospectively collected scans from a single Chinese tertiary center. The framework distinguishes fracture vs non-fracture cases, lateralization (left vs right eye), and performs pixel-wise fracture segmentation with reported performance of AUC ~0.99 for classification and Dice coefficient ~0.89 for segmentation, alongside IoU ~0.82. Training used ImageNet-pretrained weights with internal 8:1:1 splitting and 5-fold cross-validation, with strong performance consistency across held-out test folds. Preprocessing included OpenCV-based ROI extraction and data augmentation via random rotations, with all annotations generated by consensus of expert radiologists using LabelMe. No code repository, pretrained weights, or deployment interface are reported, and the model remains entirely internally validated without external cohort testing or clinical implementation.

§02Performance
Headline performance

AUC 0.99; accuracy 0.97 (classification); Dice 0.88 (segmentation).

0.99
AUC
0.97 (
accuracy
0.88 (
Dice
Full metrics — as reported
AUC 0.99; accuracy 0.97 (classification); Dice 0.88 (segmentation).
Calibration · Uncertainty
Not reported.
Bias · Fairness
Not reported.
§03Data & Validation
Study designDiagnostic accuracy study
Center typeSingle-center
Patients497
Images / eyes3016 CT images
Split80/10/10 + 5-fold cross-validation
Reporting frameworks None stated
Age range37-40
Sex (% female)Not reported
Race / ethnicity reportedN
Subgroup performanceN
§04Deployment
Deployment maturity
  1. Concept
  2. Prototype
  3. Internal val.
  4. External val.
  5. Regulator
  6. Clinical
Regulatory status
None No FDA / Health Canada / CE clearance.
Artifacts & license
Code repository none
Pretrained weights none
Live demo none
License Not specified
§05Quality Review · APPRAISE-AI
Total score
42 /100 Moderate
ClinicalDataMethodRobust.Report.Repro.
Sub-domain scores
Clinical relevance 3/4 75%
Data quality 13/24 54%
Methodological conduct 6/20 30%
Robustness of results 4/20 20%
Reporting quality 9/12 75%
Reproducibility 7/20 35%
Why this score?

The APPRAISE-AI tool grades AI/ML medical studies across 24 items in 6 subdomains, scored independently by two reviewers. The total reflects the methodological transparency of the publication — not the underlying clinical value of the model.

How to read this: high scores in clinical relevance and reporting with low scores in methodological conduct, robustness, or reproducibility is the dominant pattern in ophthalmic AI today.

Quality bands: Low <40 · Moderate 40–59 · High 60–79 · Very High 80+. Most published ophthalmic AI sits in the Low–Moderate band; studies that break into High typically combine multi-center datasets, prospective evaluation, and open-source release.

§06Full Metadata
Citation & identification
Bibliographic record
Model IDoculoplastics_bao_2023
Full author listZhan, X., Wang, L., Zhu, Q., Fan, B., & Li, G. Y.
JournalTransl Vis Sci Technol
DOI10.1167/tvst.12.4.7
ConditionsOrbital blow out fracture
Architecture
Model internals
Architecture familyCNN
Architecture detailConvolutional neural-network models (DenseNet-169 and UNet)
Funding & conflicts
Disclosures
FundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82171053 and 81570864); Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (No. 20200801043GH and 20190201083JC)
Conflicts of interestNR
Card lifecycle
Status, version, reviewers
Card statusPublished
Card versionv1.0.0
First added2026-04-28
Last reviewed2026-04-28
Reviewersattribution opt-in pending
Update history
Card changelog
  • 2026-04-28 initial publication (v1.0.0)
← Back to Oculoplastics